Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, M., and Scontras, G. (2015). The brand new differential signal out of amount and you can intercourse 
from inside the Spanish. Linguist. Rev. thirty-two, 703–737.
Hartsuiker, Roentgen., Schriefers, H., Bock, K., and you will Kikstra, G. Meters. (2003). Morphophonological affects into design out-of subject-verb arrangement. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1316–1326.
Heycock, C., and Zamparelli, R. (2005). Friends and colleagues: plurality, coordination, therefore the structure off DP. Nat. Lang. thirteen, 201–270.
Hinojosa, J., Martin-Loeches, Yards., Casado, P., Munoz, F., and you will Rubia, F. (2003). Parallels and you can differences between phrase structure and you will morphosyntactic violations inside the Foreign language: a conference-associated potentials studies. Lang. Cogn. Processes. 18, 113–142.
Igoa, J. Yards., Garcia-Albea, J. E., and you will Sanches-Casas, Roentgen. (1999). Gender-count dissociation when you look at the sentence development in the Foreign language. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 163–196.
Krstev, C., and Vitas, D. (2005). “Corpus. and you may Lexicon – Mutual Incompletness,” inside the Process of your Corpus Linguistics Appointment, eds P. Danielsson and M. Wagenmakers, Liverpool.
Malko, A beneficial., and you can Slioussar, N. (2013). “Destination errors in sex agreement: Proof away from Russian,” into the Legal proceeding Formal Methods to Slavic Linguistics: The third Indiana Appointment, eds S. Franks, ainsi que al. (Ann Arbor: Michigan College Push), 162–175.
). “History conjunct agreement inside the Slovenian,” inside Procedures out of Authoritative Answers to Slavic linguistics 2006, eds Rpton, Meters. Goledzinowska, and you may U. Savchenko (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Books), 210-227.
Mitic, I., and you may Arsenijevic, B. (2019). Structural ambiguity and optionality off contract habits for the Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian conjunct arrangement. Good J. Gen. Linguist. 4:6.
Nevins, An excellent., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., and you may Phillips, C. (2007). The fresh part from feature-amount and show-enter in processing Hindi verb arrangement abuses. Mind Res. 1164, 81–94.
Puskar, Z., and Murphy, Good. (2015). “Closest conjunct contract in serbo-croatian: a rule-buying account,” within the Subjects at InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (LAB), Vol. ninety-five, eds A great. Assmann, S. Financial, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, and you may Age. Zimmermann (Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig), 441–482.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., and you will Garrett, Yards. F. (1996). Subject-verb agreement when you look at the Foreign-language and you may English: differences in the newest role from abstract limits. Cognition 61, 261–298.
目次
Semant
Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, M., Becker, M., Cordalija, N., Kresic, Meters., et al. (2018). When linearity is out there more ladder into the syntax. PNAS 115, 495–five hundred. doi: /pnas.1712729115
The fresh new four logically you can combinations in addition to their properties was represented when you look at the (21)
Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Meters., Cordalija, Letter., Kresic, Meters., Leko, N., mais aussi al. (2016). Morphosyntactic production of coordination arrangement into the South Slavic–a comparative research. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty four, 187–224.
This part clarifies some technical issues about the choices produced in the style of our very own try out, for the white of your special properties out of South carolina morphology. It is aimed primarily for these trying to find the theoretic and you can descriptive linguistic, as opposed to psycholinguistic areas of the analysis.
In our experimental design, i have capitalized for the undeniable fact that from inside the South carolina NSg nouns avoid in a choice of -elizabeth or even in -o, and therefore its plural results in -an effective, when you find yourself meanwhile FSg nouns result in -a, as well as their plural models produce -elizabeth. So it returns an excellent entered, but really incomplete syncretism.
The combination off NSg and you can FPl allows the forming of limited sets ranging from a beneficial syncretic and you will a non-syncretic collection of nouns, due to the fact combination of NPl and you can FSg enables one opportunity, which is syncretic.
We made use of limited pairs such as (20a) in our vital stimuli. The brand new selected alternative, but not, makes it possible for a couple sandwich-selection, dependent on and therefore sex–number combination appear due to the fact very first, and you may and this given that past conjunct. This was based on several other similar idea.
New verb bears this new endings: -o getting NSg, -a towards NPl and you will FSg, or -e having FPl – we.elizabeth., you can easily distinguish NSg out-of FPl on verb. Thus, besides the unambiguously default male conclude -we, whenever a beneficial verb in the -age try introduced, we were certain that it was FPl, of course a verb into the -o was produced, we understood it was NSg. But not, when a good verb within the -an ended up being introduced – it was unclear whether it try plural, agreeing when you look at the intercourse into basic conjunct (NPl), otherwise it absolutely was one and you may arranged in sex for the past conjunct (FSg).
美人になりたい運営事務局
