Study was in fact analysed having fun with SPSS 25.0. Very first descriptive analyses have been did, including Cronbach’s alphas and you may wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate connections between gender, decades, sexual orientation, that have an enchanting/intimate mate, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you will determination to engage in sexting because independent variables, and four sexting behaviors due to the fact situated parameters. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos try considered as a way of measuring impact dimensions. The details had been joined to your model at the same time. The analysis was also stratified because of the intercourse.
Incidence out-of sexting habits
The most frequent sexting habits are becoming (21.2%) and obtaining thru an intermediary (twenty eight.4%), accompanied by 3rd-people forwarding out-of sexual content (nine.3%) and you will, finally, sending (8.1%). Descriptive analytics receive inside the Table dos.
The fresh new regression patterns was significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is actually .42 on “sending” design, .31 into the “receiving” model, .23 on the “third-team forwarding” model, and .17 to your “getting via an intermediary” design (Desk step Moldova hembra 3:
Regarding “sending” model, desire in order to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% trust interval [CI]: 5.36-), with an enchanting/intimate spouse (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), using Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), sexual orientation (OR: step one.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-step three.00) and you can decades (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step one.step 14-step one.63) was in fact significantly related to giving wedding. On the “receiving” model, with an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: step 3.27; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), determination so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step 3.89), having fun with Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: 1.16-3.10), sex (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-dos.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 1.6step 1; 95% CI: step one.dos1-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.20-step one.86) and you may ages (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12-1.41) were significantly related to finding wedding.
Regarding “third-team forwarding” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.16-6.51), desire so you can sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: 1.48-2.72), gender (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: step 1.3dos-2.91), having an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step 1.29-dos.68), having fun with Fb (OR: step one.53; 95% CI: step one.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step one.87) and years (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step one.22-step 1.66) was rather linked to involvement during the 3rd-class forwarding.
On the “finding through a mediator” model, using Instagram (OR: dos.step 16; 95% CI: step 1.47-step three.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step one.52-2.24), which have an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: 1.7step 1; 95% CI: step 1.35-dos.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.41; 95% CI: 1.11-step one.80) and you can decades (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.23-step 1.49) was rather related to involvement inside finding via a mediator.
Sex variations
The newest regression habits was indeed tall. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 try .50 for females and you can .41 to own boys into the “sending” model; .30 for women and you will .30 to possess people to your “receiving” model; .18 for women and you can .24 for males towards the “third-people forwarding” model; and you will .fourteen for women and you can .twenty-two to have men towards the “choosing thru an intermediary” design (Dining table 4:
Throughout the “sending” model, for women, determination to help you sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), having an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and ages (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: 1.17-2.20) was somewhat related to sending engagement. To own men, they were readiness to sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step three.68-nine.94), that have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step one.59-4.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.32-4.29).
Regarding “receiving” design, for girls, willingness to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: step one.43-), that have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: 2.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-2.33) and ages (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: step 1.step one7-step one.72) were rather associated with researching involvement. To have men, these people were that have a romantic/intimate mate (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-4.25), readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step three.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: step 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: step one.06-step 1.86) and age (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-step one.38).
美人になりたい運営事務局
